You give nudges a bad name

P Food

Image via Wikipedia

Last week, I read the following newspaper headline: “MPs deride Lansley’s ‘nudging’ deal with food and drink firms“. The story was based on a report by a committee of UK MPs on the effectiveness of UK Government health policy, and in particular its “Responsibility Deal” with food and drink companies, which came in for a fair bit of criticism.

Somehow, in the public consciousness of the UK, “nudging” has become synonymous with some form of self-regulation, where Government takes a step back and relies on the private sector to do what’s best. So, for example, under the Responsibility Deal, various food and drink companies have signed up to “pledges” in the form of various actions designed to have a positive impact on the nation’s health. A very large proportion of these include providing more information to consumers, or donating money to health charities and programmes.

Most of these pledges are not really nudges at all. The occasional one is perhaps, at best, an elbow twitch, quickly suppressed as the firm concerned (unsurprisingly) remembers that it’s there to make a profit. For example, there is Heineken offering to distribute glasses that display information and alcohol units – and that are branded with the Heineken logo.

Creating a good nudge requires understanding what influences people when they make decisions and tweaking the setting in which they make choices to guide them to the better outcomes. For example, putting the healthy food at eye level in shops. It is more libertarian than banning things, in that it does not restrict people’s choices. But actually, it can require some quite interventionist Government policy, whereby Government tells firms how to market and sell products. And every good nudger knows that just providing information to consumers, which forms the basis of many of the Responsibility Deal pledges, is, unless carefully designed and managed, doomed to fail.  

Nudge fans: I fear that unless something is done to salvage its good name, nudging is headed for public relations failure.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Comment on the news and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to You give nudges a bad name

  1. Ellen says:

    That could be true, but I would like to see more empirical evidence what could potentially be an useful nudge and what not. That is what we need at the moment, I think.

  2. Hi Ellen,

    I absolutely agree. This is all at a very early stage – and while we know that individual context is hugley important, designing policy programmes will hopefully become much easier with more evidence and experience. At the moment, I think the key is to test, pilot and experiment different designs before rolling out full programmes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s